Veda
HomeAnalyzeIPO AnalysisCompareCasesWatchlist
Sign In
Veda
HomeAnalyzeIPO AnalysisCompareCasesWatchlist
Sign In

VEDA's forensic scores are quantitative screening outputs — not investment advice and not a determination of fraud. Read the full disclaimer · Glossary

View:
StandaloneConsolidated
Year:
FY25FY24
LE

Lenskart Solutions Ltd

LENSKARTFY25 data
Speciality Retail—₹1,27,157.74 CrUpdated 9 Nov 2026
B

Risk Grade

LOW

73

Revenue FY25

₹4,039.24 Cr

+26.8% YoY

Net Income

₹188.07 Cr

0% YoY

EBITDA

₹640.37 Cr

+31.5% YoY

Op. Cash Flow

₹365.80 Cr

—

Market Cap

₹1,27,157.74 Cr

—

Composite Risk Score

Higher number = lower risk

LOW
73LOW
Bankruptcy Risk (Altman Z)100
Manipulation Risk (Beneish M)77
Financial Strength (Piotroski F)67

Forensic Analysis Report — Lenskart Solutions Ltd

Multi-model forensic assessment by Veda Analytics Engine

LOW RISK

Lenskart Solutions Ltd demonstrates a fundamentally sound forensic profile. Our multi-model analysis indicates limited risk of financial distress or earnings manipulation at this time.

The Altman Z-Score of 36.45 places LENSKART in the Safe Zone (above 2.99), indicating adequate financial resilience against near-term bankruptcy risk. This is consistent with a stable capital structure.

On the emerging-markets Altman Z (Bandyopadhyay form), the score is -1.92: a negative value under that measure indicates a greater probability of default within one year. It is shown as an indicator alongside the classic score and does not enter the composite.

The Beneish M-Score of -2.73 falls below the −2.22 threshold established in the original Beneish (1999) framework, indicating low probability of earnings manipulation through accrual-based techniques. The eight-variable decomposition does not surface anomalous patterns in receivables, depreciation, or asset quality indices.

The Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates average financial health. While not alarming, the score suggests pockets of weakness across the nine signals that merit monitoring — particularly around leverage dynamics and margin sustainability.

Dechow RSST analysis indicates a low fraud probability of 0.30%, well within acceptable parameters. Accrual quality appears sound.

Operating cash flow is positive at ₹366 Cr, corroborating the quality of reported earnings. Cash-backed profitability is a strong signal in our forensic assessment framework.

Our operational red flag detection system has triggered 2 high-severity alerts: Inventory Growth Exceeds Revenue Growth; Excessive Related Party Transactions. Each flag is calibrated against Indian market benchmarks and historical fraud patterns from our proprietary database of 3,000+ SEBI, SFIO, and MCA enforcement cases.

The composite forensic risk score of 73/100 (LOW) is the weighted average of each model's 0–100 safety value: Altman Z (33%), Beneish M (28%), Piotroski F (17%), Dechow F (11%), DuPont (5%), Montier C (5%). Weights are re-scaled over the models that ran, and penalty multipliers apply when Beneish flags manipulation or Altman Z is in the distress zone.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Emerging-markets Altman Z is negative — review cash profit and working capital against the one-year default signal

This analysis applies six forensic accounting models — Altman Z-Score (1968/1993), Beneish M-Score (1999), Piotroski F-Score (2000), Dechow RSST F-Score (2011), Montier C-Score (2008) and DuPont decomposition — calibrated for Indian capital market conditions. Governance is not part of the composite. Findings are indicative and should be corroborated with primary source documents.

Next Steps

Compare with Peers

See how LENSKART stacks up against sector peers